Wan 2.7 vs Wan 2.6

Adjacent version numbers usually mean one replaced the other. Here they mean two tools that happen to share a family name, and the giveaway is in a line of grey text under the reference field.

What are they each for?

Their own descriptions answer it, and they don't overlap.

Wan 2.7

"Reference-composed video, text or image in." A model for building a shot from a description plus references — images, clips or audio, up to eight of them.

Wan 2.6

"Restyle a clip you already have." A model for changing the treatment of existing footage. It accepts clips or audio and does not accept images.

Wan 2.6 won't take an image reference. That single fact tells you it isn't a newer Wan 2.7.

What actually differs?

Four rows, and the reference behaviour is the substantive one.

Four differences, and they all point the same way.

Wan 2.7 starts at two seconds; Wan 2.6 starts at five. Two seconds is the shortest minimum on the entire roster, which makes 2.7 usable for an insert or a single beat in a way 2.6 isn't.

Eight references against three. Enough for a character, a location, a style and a prop on 2.7. Three is enough for a source clip and a look.

Images against no images. This is the one that settles it. A model that won't take a still image isn't a general-purpose generator — it's a model whose input is footage.

Start and end frames against start only. So 2.7 supports keyframing between two anchors and 2.6 doesn't.

Where this falls short. The picker exposes what each accepts, not how well either performs. Whether Wan 2.6's restyling is good is a question the settings can't answer and we haven't measured.

Why does the restyling model sit in Create?

Because it isn't an editing model, and this catches people.

Wan 2.6 is in Video Create, not Video Edit. Its job is restyling footage, which sounds like editing — but the mechanism is generating a new clip conditioned on a video reference rather than modifying an existing one in place.

So if you're looking for restyling in Edit mode, you won't find it. You attach the clip as a reference in Create and describe the treatment you want.

That's a genuine second route to changing an existing clip, alongside Edit mode. Worth knowing, because Edit mode requires a source clip of three to ten seconds and this doesn't.

Restyling happens in Create, not Edit. If you looked for it in Edit mode, that's why you didn't find it.

What do they have in common?

More than the differences suggest.

Same resolutions — 720p and 1080p, no 4K on either.

Same five aspect ratios — 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3 and 3:4. Mid-table on the roster, and more than the Veo family's two.

Same audio behaviour — always on, with no toggle on either. Which matters if you've cast a voice separately, since neither model lets you decline the generated sound.

And both cap at fifteen seconds.

What do they cost?

Neither model appears on Hexcoded's published render costs panel.

That panel covers eight video models and neither Wan is among them. So there's no published figure to compare, and we're not going to derive one.

The authoritative figure is the cost shown before you render, which appears per model. For a comparison between these two specifically, that's the only source.

So when do you use which?

Three cases, and the input decides it.

All settings read from Hexcoded's Creative Studio picker in September 2026, both models observed individually. Neither model appears on the published render costs panel. Settings change with model versions. The cost shown before you render is the authoritative figure.

More on model capability, access and rights in Models.